Infinity pool cost: what rises versus a standard pool?

The only thing that changes is how the water level is held. In a skimmer pool, water sits a few centimetres below the edge stone, and surface water is drawn through the skimmer mouth. In an overflow-edge pool, water sits above the weir level and flows out continuously; the volume that flows out has to be collected somewhere and pumped back. The table below shows how this single difference spreads across items.

The total of these eight rows produces an increase of roughly 25 to 40 percent compared to a skimmer pool of the same size, on flat or gently sloping ground. The lower end of the range is for projects with a single overflow edge, a balance tank poured adjoining the pool shell, and flat ground. The upper end is for projects with two or three overflow edges, a tank located separately, and a slope edge. This is not a price schedule but a field observation based on the item breakdown seen in completed jobs; as ground slope increases, the structural item can go beyond this range altogether.

When a person enters the pool, when wind creates waves, or when the pump stops, the volume flowing down over the weir has to be held somewhere; this volume is the balance tank. The tank's size is generally taken as 8 to 10 percent of the pool's surface volume. Surface volume here is not the pool surface area multiplied by the difference between weir level and working level, but the equivalent of the dynamic load: user displacement, the water layer over the weir, and the stagnant volume in the pipework are added together to find it.

The tank is designed as a small reinforced-concrete pool in its own right. Excavation, blinding concrete, reinforcement, formwork, waterproofing, ventilation, cover and the equipment connections inside it are budgeted separately. Within the total of extra items in an infinity pool, the tank's share is, in most projects, the single largest item and on its own takes up between a third and half of the total extra cost. The tank's location directly changes this share: there is a marked difference, in excavation, formwork and pipe run, between a tank poured next to the pool shell, in the same excavation pit and, where possible, sharing a common wall, versus a tank excavated separately at another point in the garden.

The practical consequence is this: because the water layer over the weir is only a few millimetres, a one-millimetre deviation in level changes flow at that point by tens of percent. A one-metre section sitting 3 mm low draws water toward itself, cutting off the sheet at neighbouring sections, so an even water film never forms along the edge.

For this reason, the formwork, screeding and stone cladding of an overflow edge fall into a different labour class than a standard pool edge. The formwork is set with a laser level, level is measured after the concrete pour, the weir face is ground down for correction if needed, the edge stone is set with no joint or a very fine joint, and once water is added, point touch-ups are made along the edge. Compared to the labour for standard edge stone at the same length, the total of these steps corresponds to two to three times the labour hours per metre of edge. Looked at as a line item, the material difference is limited; what increases is almost entirely man-hours.

The second circulation line is a result of this same precision. While the filtration line cleans the water, the overflow line pumps the water in the balance tank back into the pool at a fixed flow rate, feeding the sheet over the weir. This second pump is selected independently of the filtration pump; its flow rate is calculated from weir length, its suction is taken from the lowest point of the tank, and it is locked against dry running by a level float. Its budget counterpart is not just the pump: the second valve group, check valve, extra pipe run, panel output and cabling are all part of the same item.

The cost of these pools rises noticeably because of the foundation systems that anchor them to the hillside, and a solid structural solution becomes mandatory on difficult terrain. At this point two different items come into play, and both concern not the pool itself but the ground the pool stands on.

A retaining wall is the structure that resists the lateral thrust of the soil behind it. Lateral earth pressure starts at zero at the top and increases with depth; if it is not resisted, the wall overturns or slides. Gravity walls resist this thrust with their own mass, while cantilever walls do so with an inverted-T reinforced-concrete body, and both need a rigid foundation going below frost depth. Drainage behind the wall is not optional; it is the mandatory detail that prevents hydrostatic pressure from building up. When the pool shell sits right in front of, or on top of, this wall, the wall is no longer a landscape element but the pool's structural system, and its cost is written into the pool item.

When soil bearing capacity is insufficient, or the sound layer lies deep, the solution is a deep foundation. A bored pile is a pile type made by filling a drilled shaft with reinforcement and concrete; compared to driven piles, it allows larger diameters and can work in harder layers. It transfers the load from the pool shell down to the sound layer at depth. In a project where a pile item enters, the outcome changes clearly: the extra cost can no longer be described within the 25 to 40 percent band, because pile count, diameter and length depend entirely on the soil survey and can, on their own, take up as much as the pool shell itself. For this reason, on a pool project on sloped ground, the soil survey is done before the architectural drawings.

Two items stand out here. The first is evaporation: the thin sheet of water flowing over the weir noticeably enlarges the surface in contact with air, the flow motion continuously disperses the stagnant moisture layer above the surface, and this effect multiplies at a view edge exposed to wind. Water make-up need rises compared to a skimmer pool of the same surface area; if the water is heated, evaporation loss also comes back directly as energy loss.

The second is pump hours. In a skimmer pool, the filtration pump runs at set hours of the day, and when it stops, the pool's appearance does not change. In an overflow-edge pool, the weir is only visible while the overflow pump is running; once the pump stops, water level drops below the weir level and the edge dries out. For as long as the pool is meant to remain visually active, the second pump also has to run. The difference in annual electricity cost follows from this and depends on the usage scenario: there is a significant difference between a hotel pool run continuously and a villa pool switched on only in the evening. A variable-speed (frequency-controlled) overflow pump and a time schedule set through automation are the two decisions that cut this item down.

A third expense item is on the maintenance side. The balance tank is part of the pool's water; sediment accumulates in it, biofilm can form on its walls, and it needs to be drained and cleaned periodically. When an access cover, lighting and ventilation for the tank are not thought through at the project stage, this cleaning turns into a separate job every single time. The half day set aside for the tank's cover dimensions at the project and pool construction stage is recovered again and again in the years that follow.

The first is the number of edges: the difference between a single overflow edge and three overflow edges is not just weir length, but overflow channel length, tank volume and pump flow rate. In most plots the view faces one direction only; finishing the other edges with a skimmer or a plain overflow channel shrinks the extra items noticeably without spoiling the look. The second is the tank's location and formwork: a tank sharing a common wall with the pool shell, completed in the same excavation pit and on the same pour day, saves on every one of excavation, formwork, labour and pipe items compared to a separately excavated tank. The third is having the weir stone arrive on site pre-worked to size; cutting on site means both waste and extra labour hours.

Most of the difference between proposals often comes not from pricing policy but from some of these ten lines being missing from the proposal altogether. A proposal that leaves out the balance tank, leaves the structural item to assumption, or gets by with a single pump looks cheap; the missing items come back as extra work during construction. Comparing proposals without lining the items up under the same headings means comparing two different jobs.

None of the techniques used here are specific to the pool industry. A weir is a classic structure used in river and drainage engineering to measure flow and hold level; carried over to a pool edge, its measuring function turns into a visual effect while the calculation stays the same. Retaining walls and bored piles are carried over from road, harbour and building foundation engineering. An infinity pool budget is the total of items from these three disciplines, and a pool construction proposal should be read as a document that writes these three headings out separately.

The basis of comparison is a concrete skimmer pool. 10 × 5 m concrete pool costs 1,850,000 TL in October 2026 (excluding VAT). This price rests on a calculation that scales with size: the reference pool is 1.5 m deep, with a 95 m² shell area and 75 m³ of water. The shell area is the floor area plus the perimeter multiplied by the depth; structural and finishing work grow with that area, the mechanical installation with the water volume. Ground conditions, lining type and access are added at the site survey.